XVI century. As if Christ, having obtained temporal mediation, had entrusted the eternal and eternal ministry to his servants Calvin, Inst. 696. Definition of lalanguefrancaise.com mediation – These definitions of mediation are indicative and taken from royalty-free dictionaries. More information on the word mediation is provided by the editors of the lalanguefrancaise.com According to Marinka Schillings, mediation would be discouraged in two cases: Independent private mediators, defined in 2001 by the creation of the first association of professional mediators, the CPMN. They develop the concept of mediation as an independent discipline with a clear identification of a judicial conflict with its three invariants: In 1995, the legislator formulated conciliation and judicial mediation, but did not propose a definition. The mediator has no power other than that resulting from the confidence of the parties. He is neither judge nor arbitrator. The role of the mediator is to listen to the parties to the conflict, to bring them together so that they can confront their points of view and help them find THEIR negotiated solution that suits their respective interests. Our DCF training organization offers training for obtaining the mediator certificate. More specialized training, for example in criminal mediation, in companies, completes the offer, but is not necessarily certified. However, the idea that everyone can have of the person influences their actions when they are a mediator, according to the values that are “at the center” of their own beliefs or motivations. It intervenes in the mediation process (in certain “procedures”) and, consequently, in the solution that concludes the mediation more or less voluntarily (on the part of the parties) and definitively.
Judicial mediation was introduced in France by the Law of 8 February 1995 and the Decree of 22 July 1996, codified in Articles 131-1 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure. This form of mediation is part of a court case. It is ordered by the judge, subject to the consent of the parties. Then the judge appoints and appoints the mediator. It should be noted that the judge is in a strong incentive position. In case of acceptance during the proceedings, the judge issues a mediation order. The initial duration of the mediation may not exceed three months. This mission may be extended once for the same period at the request of the mediator, the judge or the parties.
In practice, mediation is most often offered, its superiority is mainly due to the fact that the mediator promotes the emergence of common problems and solutions by the people themselves, without seeking to resolve the conflict for them or force them to reach an agreement (as opposed to mediation). These provisions transpose Directive 2013/11/EU of 21 May 2013. Verbal Aikido is an example of a conflict resolution approach that integrates these three elements into its practice.   However, this does not apply to all streams of influence in mediation. Indeed, mediation is defined by the other associations as a multidisciplinary method that takes up elements of psychology, sociology, anthropology of civil law, criminal law, therapy, confessional approach, etc. In some areas, sites offering the services of a mediator can be consulted both on the internet and on the website of the Autorité des Marchés Financiers in order to resolve a dispute amicably either with a financial intermediary or with a listed company. However, the mediator will only accept the request to the extent that it is seized. A first step will have been tried with the intermediary or company whose securities are held. The mediator is a trained professional who has the necessary listening and ensures compliance with the basic principles of mediation, without which there is no mediation: Decree No.
2015-282 of 11. March 2015 on the simplification of civil procedure in electronic communications and amicable dispute settlement requires the parties and their respective lawyers to observe a preparatory phase of amicable settlement before any dispute. This obligation is reflected in the reference, in the initiating file, to the attempt to settle the dispute amicably by means of an amicable settlement. In the absence of mention and “unless justified by a legitimate reason” related to urgency or when public order is at stake, the judge may propose mediation or conciliation. Subject to these reservations, the absence of an indication does not give rise to a penalty; The parties being free to choose or not to opt for the amicable way and the choice of the consensual way, they do not have to justify themselves, a sibylline formula of non-use or failure of the amicable way may suffice. There is no unanimity on these restrictions. In the training at the Professional School of Mediation and Negotiation, affiliated to the Professional Chamber of Mediation and Negotiation (CPMN), bad faith is considered a natural element of conflict, and the mediator is not there to judge the strategies of the protagonists, but to help them find a way out. As for the notion of “mental illness”, if the mediator is a mediation professional, he intervenes to help the relationship, not to diagnose individuals.  With such a definition, mediation with a strong legal framework (“legalized”) includes various forms of amicable settlement that are not necessarily provided for in official texts: judicial or conventional mediation or mediation systems dependent on public or private services and, in some cases, the intervention of a judicial arbitrator. However, their inclusion in the scope of the legal definition of mediation is controversial.  The mediation clause can be included in all contracts.
Case law recognizes the validity of mediation clauses. But without forcing the parties to agree or compromise. The mediation clauses provide that before initiating legal proceedings, the signatory parties consider using a mediator or mediation through the use of a third party, such as an expert, whose task will be to help them find a mutually acceptable solution. This contractual obligation must comply with the provisions relating to unfair terms. This clause may, a fortiori, be inserted in a mediation agreement in order to provide for the event that the parties have difficulties in complying with the agreement (which is then a new contract), in particular in the event of a change of situation. If a contract provides for the possibility of referring the matter to the judge “in the event of failure or refusal of mediation”, one of the parties may not reject in advance a mediation procedure that has not yet been conducted (1st Civil Chamber, 8 April 2009, appeal: 08-10866, BICC No. 708 of 1. October 2009 and Legifrance). Decree No. 2012-66 of 20 January 2012 on the amicable settlement of disputes and Decree No. 2015-282 of 11 March 2015 on the simplification of civil procedure for electronic communications and the amicable settlement of disputes have considerably expanded the scope of mediation. Title VI of the Code of Civil Procedure is therefore entitled `Conciliation and mediation`.
The application or declaration before the court of first instance shall specify the measures taken to reach an amicable settlement of the dispute; If, at the time of the initiation of the proceedings and in accordance with Articles 56 and 58, the steps taken to reach an amicable settlement of their dispute are not justified, the court may propose to the parties a conciliation or mediation measure. The word “mediation” has given rise to “mediator”, which means “cut off from the middle”. A decree of 20 January 2012 on the amicable settlement of disputes defines mediation as: Mediation was originally defined by the professional mediators of the Professional Chamber of Mediation and Negotiation as an independent discipline associated with philosophy, rhetoric and pedagogy.