probable — 1 *probable, possible Analogous words: credible, credible, colorable, *plausible: reasonable, *rational Antonyms: unlikely Opposing words: *doubtful, doubtful, doubtful, problematic: * . New thesaurus There`s no way to avoid using them probably in certain contexts, but you need to be aware of the uncertainties. First, let`s consider what probably isn`t – it`s not vague. Vague words like “promptly” and “substantial” require you to judge a particular set of circumstances from the perspective of a reasonable person. On the other hand, something much simpler seems likely to be – an expression of the degree of probability that something will happen. In R v Wills [1990] Crim LR 715, the Court of Appeal, of which Lord Lane J. was a member, considered whether it was “probable” that an act or omission of the mother`s partner caused unnecessary suffering to a child within the meaning of section 1 of the CYPA. The child`s skull was fractured and the partner did not receive medical attention for her. The medical evidence was that in only 10% of cases or less, a simple skull fracture resulted in complications requiring treatment.
When such complications occurred, however, bleeding and brain damage would result. The court`s judgments are not reproduced, but the note states: “Counsel had criticized Lord Diplock`s remarks in R. v. Sheppard [1980]. in the sense that the term “probable” must be understood as excluding only what can rightly be described as highly unlikely. The court agreed that the remarks were incidental, but did not agree that they glossed over an ordinary English word; They interpreted the word correctly in the context of the law in which the word was found. Support for a sense of “probable” that extended beyond probability to something that might well happen (but not a mere possibility) was found in Transport Ministry v Simmonds [1973] 1 New Zealand LR 359.” Two other cases in the context of the TDA are characterized by a broad interpretation of the term “probable” in the respective contexts of Articles 3 and 14 of the CTA, although they do not define that term. In Holloway/Cross [1981] 1 All ER 1012, a dealer`s estimate of a vehicle`s mileage was considered indicative of the vehicle`s history.
As Donaldson LJ put it, “It seems almost undeniably clear to me that if it wasn`t a trade name, it was probably taken by the buyer as an indication of the vehicle`s history and, of course, whether it was significantly incorrect. It would not be useful to ask the seller for advice on the apparent mileage driven, except to obtain an indication of the actual mileage. Holloway v Cross was quoted with approval in R v Bevelectric Ltd (1993) 157 JP 323. In the present case, it was argued that statements that washing machine engines should be replaced were expressions of opinion and not fact and did not fall within the scope of article 14. These were established to be findings of fact, but in each case Staughton C.J. stated, referring to Holloway: “The offence charged in this case was under § 1; and paragraph 3 contains provisions on designations that are “indicative”, as prohibited by Article 1; In other words, the offence can be committed implicitly or by annuity. This also applies to a criminal offence referred to in Article 14; See paragraph 2(a). Even if a statement that the engine had to be replaced was an opinion, the implication of the hint that a true evaluation had been made was a simple unvarnished fact. On this basis, Holloway`s case shows that the alleged crimes fall within the scope of section 14. What is “likely” can therefore be something that is only suggested by allusions. probable — 1.
As an adverb, it probably needs the support of a qualifying or intensive word like more, whole or very (you`re probably gone now/It`s more of a fly agaric), whereas in AmE it is often alone: • It is possible to predict that.. Use of Modern English Oh, and let yourself reasonably fall from reasonably probable – nothing is achieved by adding vagueness to a certain degree of probability. probable — ► ADJECTIVE (more likely, very likely) 1) as could be the case; probably. 2) promising. ► ADVERB ▪ probably. ● A probable story! See ↑a probable story! . The English dictionary of the terms Ashworth J said: “It would have been very easy for Parliament to simply adopt that a person who gives or gives a clue by any means, and that would involve any court which is called upon to consider it with the question whether what has been said, done or shown, was a representation or index, and there is no doubt that opinions may differ in many cases. But in order to extend its network more widely, and I think it is a question of better protecting customers, Parliament has chosen a broader language.
The expression “likely to be an indication” seems to me to be a broader consideration than the word “indication” alone. You`re watching. with clients and the effect on clients of what is said, done or indicated. This article has been drafted to take account of cases where, under strict interpretation, it may permit two arrangements. The essence of the inclusion in Article 11(2) of the words `capable of being understood as an indication` in Article 11(2) shows that the legislature intended to protect persons who might otherwise face a defence that the words offensive in their true interpretation meant something different from what they thought. Doble v. David Greig Ltd [1972] 2 All ER 195 cases concerned the meaning of the term `probable` as it appeared in section 11 of the Trade Descriptions Act 1968 (`the TDA`). This section dealt with misleading price indications and article 11(2) made it a criminal offence to “give any indication, by whatever means, that the goods are offered at a lower price than they actually are”. The defendant displayed bottles of Ribena on the shelves of its supermarkets, which were therefore offered for delivery (see § 6).
The price on the bottle cap was 5/9d. A label on the bottles read: “The deposit on this bottle is refundable 4 days on return”. A customer was charged 5/9d. A sign at the checkout read: “We do not accept returns of empty bottles. We do not charge a deposit at the time of purchase. The charge was that since the customer could not get a 4d refund for the bottle, he should have been charged 5/5d. The contractor must ensure adequate and continuous protection of the work, company property and adjacent property and must take all necessary precautions to keep and maintain the workplace free from recognized hazards that may cause death, illness or injury to persons or property damage. In R. v. Sheppard [1980] 3 All ER 899, the House of Lords had to examine whether the neglect of a child was `intentional` within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 (`CYPA`).
Under Article 1(2), a parent is deemed to have neglected his or her child `in such a way as to be harmful to his or her health` if he or she has failed to provide adequate food or other essential goods referred to in that paragraph. While this case dealt with the meaning of “deliberately”, Lord Diplock also considered the meaning of “probably”. He said: “I was referring to parents` knowledge of the existence of a certain health risk and not to a probability.